首页> 外文OA文献 >Exploring the psychological factors involved in the Ladbroke Grove rail accident
【2h】

Exploring the psychological factors involved in the Ladbroke Grove rail accident

机译:探讨Ladbroke Grove铁路事故中涉及的心理因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ten years after the event and the question as to exactly why a driver passed a signal at danger to cause the Ladbroke Grove rail disaster is still an open one. This paper uses the literature on human error and cognition, combined with critical path analysis, to provide further insight. Five aspects of train operation are drawn out of the known facts surrounding the incident: custom and practice in the use of the Driver's Reminder Appliance, operation and use of the Automatic Warning System, the sequence of signalling information, methods of supplying route information, and speed restrictions. Associated with each are several important human factors issues which, combined, give rise to five potential explanations. Critical path analysis is used to map these explanations onto the known facts of the situation. It is suggested that the proximal cause of the Ladbroke Grove rail crash was a combination of an association–activation error and a mode error (leading the driver to mistakenly assume he had activated the Reminder Appliance) together with a loss-of-activation error (the driver failing to remember that a previous signal was showing caution) and a data-driven-activation error (by associating an in-cab warning to the wrong external source). The findings support the original inquiry recommendations, but also go further into predictive methods of detecting problems at the human/transport system interface
机译:事件发生十年后,以及关于为什么驾驶员通过危险信号导致Ladbroke Grove铁路灾难的确切问题仍然悬而未决。本文使用有关人为错误和认知的文献,结合关键路径分析,以提供进一步的见解。从围绕事件的已知事实中得出了火车运行的五个方面:习惯和使用驾驶员提醒设备的习惯,自动警告系统的运行和使用,信号信息的顺序,提供路线信息的方法以及速度限制。与每个问题相关的是几个重要的人为因素,这些问题加在一起,产生了五种可能的解释。关键路径分析用于将这些解释映射到情况的已知事实上。建议将Ladbroke Grove轨道撞车的近端原因归结为关联激活错误和模式错误(导致驾驶员错误地认为自己已经激活了提醒器)和激活丢失错误(驾驶员无法记住先前的信号显示了警告)和数据驱动的激活错误(通过将驾驶室内警告与错误的外部来源相关联)。研究结果支持最初的查询建议,但也进一步涉及了在人机/运输系统接口处检测问题的预测方法

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号